Krebs, CEMP data, series updated from Garcia et al 2021
Krebs, CEMP data, series updated with data from Chartley Krebs
Relazioni annuali della Sezione Forestale, Canton Ticino
Van Cleve et al. 2018; HOLLINGSWORTH 2008 (Bonanza Creek LTER)
HOLLINGSWORTH 2008 (Bonanza Creek LTER), updated by LaMontagne
PONS & PAUnited States of America (the)S 2012

approximative extraction from the map in Fig. 1
Ordinal scale multiple to 0-10 to account for intermediate steps in the original 0-3 index
Text in pages 307-308; Supplementary material link broken
Figure 1, seeds/tree based on median value in boxplots
Figure 2, divided by five to give values per tree (presented as per plot, and five trees sampled per plot)
Figure 3. Only include data from seed-propogated trees, and a single provenance selected (CP037). 2009 exclided as unclear whether low seed produciton due to juvenile plants
Figure 1; values were back-transformed from natural logarithm
Figure 5; not obvious infestation only; total number cones / number trees
Figure 6; not obvious infestation only; total number cones / number trees
Data taken from Waldsustandsbericht 2016 Hessen, percentage of beech with medium or strong masting in Hesse state
Data from online supp info. Summed for each transect, then avaeraged across transect. Rosmarius excluded as full flowering season not cpatured. Orobanche latisquama,  Anagallis arvensis , Centaurea linifolia, Centaurea paniculata, Galium aparine, leuzea conifera, Convolvulus althaeoides, Linum strictum, Sideritis hirsuta,   excluded as not perennial/unclear if perennial/short-lived (excluded if status unclear)
I selected an approximate ?center point? from the surveyed sites for each species
Data taken directly from supplementary information
Figure 3 and text para 2, page 1182 (reporting data from local seed traps)
Table 2, NS - number of surviving cones per branch. Not that cones mature and disperse the following year, so 1967-1968 is 1969 in the database
There are two study sites with precise GPS coordinates but the male flower data from both sites have been combined into a single value. For the GPS coordinates, I therefore took the middle of the segment connecting the two sites.
Figure 3, data for female production of ripe fruit
Supp Info, index is standard deviations from mean production, but SD not reported in the paper
Figure 2; data on scars/branch only fully and clearly readable from stand 4
Figure 2; % indivs reproducing = 100 - % plants classified as absent
Figure 5, take values of seed producing scapes
Figure 2;  33 years of animal data but only 31 years of seed data in the figure
Table 2, with value for 1994 estimated from Figure 6
Table 2, with value for 1994 estimated from Figure 5
Table 2, with value for 1994 estimated from Figure 4
Table 2, with value for 1994 estimated from Figure 3
Table 2, with value for 1994 estimated from Figure 2
Table 2, with value for 1994 estimated from Figure 1
This site 2 is with the same coordinates as the site 1 because it is adjacent to site 1.
Figure 1; converted from million seed/ha*month to seed/ha*year
Appendix C, mid-points of classes taken for each categorised tree, and population mean calculated
Table 2; converted from cones/plot to cones/ha
Figure 1. Mean of the two sample sites taken (approx 1km apart, but precise locations not given so cannot include separately)
Figure 1, Appendix 1, data originally collected by Finnish Forest Research Institute
Figure 1, converted from millions seeds/ha to seeds/m2
Segment B in thesis by Spector, 2009-2019 data from the Annual Whitebark Pine Reoprts, The Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team
Fig 1 and 2. Note, all values devided by 70, total area of traps to create values per quare metre. Not adjusted for species specific forest BA
Table 3 and Figure 5; only Whiteoak Sink site (low deer abundance)
Figure 4A; total number of monitored trees
Table 2; unit = kg cones harvested (Table 2)/ha Pinus pinea forest (Table 1)
Figure 1; converted from kJ/tree to cones/tree
Figure 2. Peak fruit category within the year for riple fruit. Fruit ripens across Dec-Jan, so dated to the start of the fruiting perdiod (flowering has a clear annual cyce)
This series includes data from Figure  3 in Bieber & Ruf 2004 (period 1984-2001) and from Figure 1 in Lebl et al. 2011 (period 2002-2009)
The unit is kg of seeds harvested in the region
Supplementary material 3, column Harvest
Figure 1, curve for data above 800 m asl
Figure 1, curve for data below 800 m asl
Figure 5 - only data from 1989 to 1994 as data from 1995 overlap with ? (ask Janet)
Figure 5 - we included only data from 1989 up to 1994 as data starting from 1995 overlap with AFZ data from Brandeburg (ID code FDE00XX)
Hartig used known mast years for studying starch depletion in the wood; there is no scale for masting intensity; and it is unclear which proxy was used to identify masting
The 1843 year in Hilton & Packam 2003 was not found in sources cited by Hilton & Packam 2003 for the series G1 in this year
Figure 2. All seeds (viable, damaged, predated, empty)
Online source: http://bfw.ac.at/cms_stamm/430/pdf/ffcc/EP14/07_Nussbaumer.pdf; slide number 22
Figure 1 - Series 1955-1976 is an index 0-100; while series 1977-1995 is in nuts m-2
Figure 3. Since in Figure 3 the x axis indicates the year of seed fall (one year later than flowering year), we shifted the entire series to the previous year, i.e. the year of cone and seed production.
Figure 4, Forest plot, Web site: https://www.nps.gov/articles/denali-crp-spruce-cone-production.htm
Figure 4, Treeline plot, Web site: https://www.nps.gov/articles/denali-crp-spruce-cone-production.htm
Data provided by Austrian Research Centre for Forests Department of Forest Growth and Silviculture
data shared by Guillermo Martinez Pastur, updated
data shared by Hacket-Pain, Jonathan Lageard and Peter Thomas
data shared by Tommy Patterson, based on data from Brockway