Utilizing a combination of machine learning models (Random Forest, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machines, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Linear Discriminant Analysis) and a deep Artificial Neural Network model, 'MBMethPred' can predict medulloblastoma subgroups, including wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4 from DNA methylation beta values. See Sharif Rahmani E, Lawarde A, Lingasamy P, Moreno SV, Salumets A and Modhukur V (2023), MBMethPred: a computational framework for the accurate classification of childhood medulloblastoma subgroups using data integration and AI-based approaches. Front. Genet. 14:1233657. <doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1233657> for more details.

Evaluate whether a microbiome sample is a mixture of two
    samples, by fitting a model for the number of read counts as a
    function of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) allele and the
    genotypes of two potential source samples.
    Lobo et al. (2021) <doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab308>.

Fits Bayesian dose-response model-based network meta-analysis (MBNMA) 
    that incorporate multiple doses within an agent by modelling different dose-response functions, as
    described by Mawdsley et al. (2016) <doi:10.1002/psp4.12091>. 
    By modelling dose-response relationships this can connect networks of evidence that might
    otherwise be disconnected, and can improve precision on treatment estimates. Several common 
    dose-response functions are provided; others may be added by the user. Various characteristics
    and assumptions can be flexibly added to the models, such as shared class effects. The consistency 
    of direct and indirect evidence in the network can be assessed using unrelated mean effects models 
    and/or by node-splitting at the treatment level.

Fits Bayesian time-course models for model-based network meta-analysis (MBNMA) that allows inclusion of multiple
  time-points from studies. Repeated measures over time are accounted for within studies by applying different time-course functions,
  following the method of Pedder et al. (2019) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1351>. 
  The method allows synthesis of studies with multiple follow-up measurements that can account for time-course for a single or multiple 
  treatment comparisons. Several general time-course functions are provided; others may be added 
  by the user. Various characteristics can be flexibly added to the models, such as correlation between time points and shared 
  class effects. The consistency of direct and indirect evidence in the network can be assessed using unrelated mean effects 
  models and/or by node-splitting.