STRING is a comprehensive database of protein-protein interactions (PPI) that in version 11.0, covers 24,584,628 proteins from 5,090 organisms. Directly quoting from their paper:
The STRING database aims to collect, score and integrate all publicly available sources of protein–protein interaction information, and to complement these with computational predictions. Its goal is to achieve a comprehensive and objective global network, including direct (physical) as well as indirect (functional) interactions.
(source: Szklarczyk, Damian, et al. “STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets.” Nucleic acids research 47.D1 (2019): D607-D613. )
You can find an argument named “species” in every rbioapi STRING function. Providing the species argument is not mandatory, but it has been recommended in STRING API’s documentation to always specify the species. An exception is when your input proteins’ vector length is more than 100; In such cases, the species argument is required. Otherwise, calling the function without providing the species will produce an ERROR.
Although STRING API resources will handle and recognize a variety of identifiers, it is recommended that you first map your IDs to STRING IDs before using them in other rbioapi STRING functions.
## 1 We create a variable with our genes' NCBI IDs proteins <- c("p53", "BRCA1", "cdk2", "Q99835", "CDC42","CDK1","KIF23", "PLK1","RAC2","RACGAP1","RHOA","RHOB", "PHF14", "RBM3") ## 2 Now we map our protein IDs proteins_mapped <- rba_string_map_ids(ids = proteins, species = 9606) ## 3 What we need and will use for the rest of this vignette is the `stringId` column
You can retrieve a list of interactions that the proteins in your set have with each other along with the STRING annotations of each interaction. You may filter the results by using required_score and network_type arguments.
See the ‘values’ section
function’s manual for information on the returned columns.
In the last example, we only obtained the interaction which our proteins have among themselves, what if we wanted to get a list of every protein which interact with our protein(s)?
To do that, we can use
Let’s go back to the interaction network. As you must have seen in
the STRING webpages, STRING plots the interaction network of your
proteins with many customizations available. You can also do that with
STRING API services.
rba_string_network_image function is
very flexible and you have a variety of options; see the function’s
STRING let you perform two types of enrichments. See STRING’s paper for more information.
The first type is the conventional type, which statistically tests your supplied gene sets against some sets of annotation. Currently, STRING supports Gene Ontology, KEGG pathways, UniProt Keywords, PubMed publications, Pfam domains, InterPro domains, and SMART domains. (source).
As usual, we inspect the output using the
function. As you can see below, the enrichment results of each category
can be found as the returned list’s elements.
str(enriched, max.level = 1) #> List of 13 #> $ COMPARTMENTS :'data.frame': 25 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ Component :'data.frame': 17 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ DISEASES :'data.frame': 11 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ Function :'data.frame': 12 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ InterPro :'data.frame': 3 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ KEGG :'data.frame': 45 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ Keyword :'data.frame': 14 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ NetworkNeighborAL:'data.frame': 5 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ PMID :'data.frame': 100 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ Process :'data.frame': 148 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ RCTM :'data.frame': 59 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ TISSUES :'data.frame': 12 obs. of 10 variables: #> $ WikiPathways :'data.frame': 46 obs. of 10 variables:
Let us see the “DISEASES” results as an example. Below, we can see which terms of the Human Disease Ontology were over-represented:
Please Note: Other services supported by rbioapi also provide Over-representation analysis tools. Please see the vignette article Do with rbioapi: Over-Representation (Enrichment) Analysis in R (link to the documentation site) for an in-depth review.
Even without incorporating annotation data, STRING can calculate if your proteins are functionally related. Briefly, STRING accomplishes this by comparing the interactions’ distribution in your protein-set to the interactions’ distribution in the proteome. Read STRING’s paper for more information.
As you have seen above, STRING maps the proteins to multiple annotation sources. You can obtain any annotation associated with your proteins without performing enrichment analysis and retrieving just the significant portion.
Some rbioapi STRING functions were not covered in this vignette, please check their manuals:
To cite STRING (Please see https://string-db.org/cgi/about?footer_active_subpage=references):
To cite rbioapi:
#> R version 4.3.1 (2023-06-16 ucrt) #> Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) #> Running under: Windows 11 x64 (build 22621) #> #> Matrix products: default #> #> #> locale: #>  LC_COLLATE=C #>  LC_CTYPE=English_United States.utf8 #>  LC_MONETARY=English_United States.utf8 #>  LC_NUMERIC=C #>  LC_TIME=English_United States.utf8 #> #> time zone: Europe/Brussels #> tzcode source: internal #> #> attached base packages: #>  stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base #> #> other attached packages: #>  rbioapi_0.8.0 #> #> loaded via a namespace (and not attached): #>  digest_0.6.33 R6_2.5.1 fastmap_1.1.1 xfun_0.40 #>  magrittr_2.0.3 cachem_1.0.8 knitr_1.44 htmltools_0.5.5 #>  png_0.1-8 rmarkdown_2.25 DT_0.29 cli_3.6.1 #>  grid_4.3.1 sass_0.4.7 jquerylib_0.1.4 compiler_4.3.1 #>  httr_1.4.7 rstudioapi_0.15.0 tools_4.3.1 curl_5.0.2 #>  ellipsis_0.3.2 evaluate_0.21 bslib_0.5.1 yaml_2.3.7 #>  htmlwidgets_1.6.2 rlang_1.1.1 jsonlite_1.8.7 crosstalk_1.2.0